引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 706次   下载 246  
分享到: 微信 更多
不同包扎方法对标准去骨瓣减压术后患者颅内压的影响
刘博虎1,2
1.(1)昆明市第一人民医院神经外科,云南 昆明 650034;2)昆明医科大学第二附属医院,云南 昆明 650101)
摘要:
[摘要]目的 探讨不同包扎方法对重型颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后患者颅内压力的影响.方法 对36例重型颅脑损伤患者行标准去大骨瓣减压术,术中留置颅内压监护传感器探头,分别于术后即时、术后72 h、术后120 h和术后168 h分别采用弹力帽、敷贴2种不同包扎方法,监测并记录颅内压数值.结果 术后即时、术后72 h、术后120 h和术后168 h组患者弹力网帽包扎后颅内压较敷贴贴敷均明显增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 术后不同时间组弹力网帽包扎后颅内压均较敷贴贴敷增高.
关键词:  [关键词]重型颅脑损伤  标准去大骨瓣减压  包扎方法  颅内压
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:[基金项目]国家自然科学基金资助项目(81460174);昆明医科大学研究生创新基金资助项目(2013S17)
The Influence of Different Wrap Method on the Intracranial Pressure of Patients after Standard Craniectomy
LIU Bo-hu1,2
1.(1)Dept. of Neurosurgery,The 1st People’s Hospital of Kunming City,Kunming Yunnan 650034;2)The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650101,China)
Abstract:
[Abstract]Objective To explore the influence of different methods of bandaging on the postoperative intracranial pressure of patients with severe brain injury patients after decompression craniectomy. Methods The standard decompressive craniectomy was use for the 36 cases of severe traumatic brain injury patients, and the intracranial pressure monitoring sensor probe was indwelled in operaion. Two different dressing methods of elasticity mesh cap and applicator were used for the patients respectively at 0h, 72h, 120h and 168h after operation, and the value of intracranial pressure was monitored and recorded. Result The intracranial pressure of elastic cap were significantly higher than the applicator respectively in operation immediate postoperative 72h, 120h and 168h(P <0.05), the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions The intracranial pressure of elastic cap is significantly higher than the applicator at different times after the surgery group.
Key words:  [Key words]Severe brain injury  Standard decompressive craniectomy  Wrap method  Intracranial pressure